I haven’t read this, but expect it to be difficult to parse based on the comments on the other post—maybe you should try an adversarial collaboration type post if this ever gets hashed out?
I am personally finding both interesting to read, even though it is hard to hold both sides in my head at once. I would encourage the participants to keep hashing it out insofar as you yourselves are finding it somewhat productive! Distillation can come later.
(I may have an ulterior motive here of being excited in general to see people try to hash out major disagreements using the dialogues format, I am cheering this on to succeed...)
I think you’re right that it will take work to parse; it’s definitely taking me work to parse! Possibly what you suggest would be good, but it sounds like work. I’ll see what I think after the dialogue.
I haven’t read this, but expect it to be difficult to parse based on the comments on the other post—maybe you should try an adversarial collaboration type post if this ever gets hashed out?
I am personally finding both interesting to read, even though it is hard to hold both sides in my head at once. I would encourage the participants to keep hashing it out insofar as you yourselves are finding it somewhat productive! Distillation can come later.
(I may have an ulterior motive here of being excited in general to see people try to hash out major disagreements using the dialogues format, I am cheering this on to succeed...)
I think you’re right that it will take work to parse; it’s definitely taking me work to parse! Possibly what you suggest would be good, but it sounds like work. I’ll see what I think after the dialogue.