Oh, the interpretive questions are the fun stuff, for sure. Everett’s work was seminal. And yes, Mach was an inspiration for Einstein, though the eventual relativity theory was quite far from that. What I am unhappy with is the claims that one interpretation has more “truth” to it than another. More inspiration, maybe, but that’s it.
Oh, the interpretive questions are the fun stuff, for sure. Everett’s work was seminal. And yes, Mach was an inspiration for Einstein, though the eventual relativity theory was quite far from that. What I am unhappy with is the claims that one interpretation has more “truth” to it than another. More inspiration, maybe, but that’s it.