Doesn’t surprise me, but I lean towards the opposite reasoning. I think the majority of people understand vegetarian/vegan arguments, so the imposters don’t have any kind of disadvantage—but vegetarian/vegan people likely think the majority of people don’t understand those arguments (or else why wouldn’t they arrive at the same conclusions), which results in a miscalibration about how to represent their beliefs to people.
Doesn’t surprise me, but I lean towards the opposite reasoning. I think the majority of people understand vegetarian/vegan arguments, so the imposters don’t have any kind of disadvantage—but vegetarian/vegan people likely think the majority of people don’t understand those arguments (or else why wouldn’t they arrive at the same conclusions), which results in a miscalibration about how to represent their beliefs to people.
ETA: Likewise the reverse.