I agree with everything mentioned in this post. However one could give examples of placed in which the things you mentioned wouldn’t necessarily apply. I do think you could if you see human society as a unity give objective values of a tree or a commodity. Of course the objective value would then never remain the same, because conditions would change, and also it would still have nothing to do with the inherent value. Which is as you pointed out not existing. Also there is a darker dimension to all you mentioned. What would be the value of a human being. so I think one could really expand your intuition in other areas and come up with interesting conclusions. Another area your logic would not apply would be the stock market if both investors have the same long term goal every trade would necessarily lead to one loosing and one winning expect if the one selling is buying something with a higher return in that time frame and then a third person would loose
I agree with everything mentioned in this post. However one could give examples of placed in which the things you mentioned wouldn’t necessarily apply. I do think you could if you see human society as a unity give objective values of a tree or a commodity. Of course the objective value would then never remain the same, because conditions would change, and also it would still have nothing to do with the inherent value. Which is as you pointed out not existing. Also there is a darker dimension to all you mentioned. What would be the value of a human being. so I think one could really expand your intuition in other areas and come up with interesting conclusions. Another area your logic would not apply would be the stock market if both investors have the same long term goal every trade would necessarily lead to one loosing and one winning expect if the one selling is buying something with a higher return in that time frame and then a third person would loose