Where does he say or imply anything like “in line with a naturalist worldview”?
The idea that everything is potentially understandable.
Which (1) he also doesn’t say and (2) doesn’t imply a naturalist worldview unless “understandable” is taken in a particular way which Callahan probably doesn’t have in mind.
Where does he say or imply anything like “in line with a naturalist worldview”?
The idea that everything is potentially understandable.
Which (1) he also doesn’t say and (2) doesn’t imply a naturalist worldview unless “understandable” is taken in a particular way which Callahan probably doesn’t have in mind.