Since we seem to have direct experiential access to them as part of our subjective phenomenology, this suggests on Occamian grounds that they should not be as physically or ontologically complex as neurophysical brain states.
How so ? I don’t follow your reasoning, and I’m not sure what you mean by “neurophysical brain states”—are there any other kinds ? Ultimately, every human brain is made of neurons...
How so ? I don’t follow your reasoning, and I’m not sure what you mean by “neurophysical brain states”—are there any other kinds ? Ultimately, every human brain is made of neurons...
I didn’t understand that either.
Not exclusively. There are glial cells, for example.
Good point. I should’ve said, “made of neurons or other physical substances” :-)