Since the map is a metaphor for the relationship between my mind and objective reality, I’m not sure what the “relationship between the map and objective reality” is actually supposed to reference.
My empirical beliefs are subjective because they are beliefs in my mind. They are supposed to be objective in that the beliefs are supposed to respond in certain kinds of ways to new sensory input (this is Aumann’s Agreement Theorem).
“Subjectively” is an adverb that attempts to modify “objective.” If all that it means is that empirical beliefs are subjective and objective at the same time, I think the grammar of the phrasing makes the point misleading.
Further, I’m unclear about the intended point of noticing that empirical beliefs are subjective AND objective. The map is not the territory, but Eliezer seems to think this post is saying more than that—but I don’t see what more there is to say.
Since the map is a metaphor for the relationship between my mind and objective reality, I’m not sure what the “relationship between the map and objective reality” is actually supposed to reference.
My empirical beliefs are subjective because they are beliefs in my mind. They are supposed to be objective in that the beliefs are supposed to respond in certain kinds of ways to new sensory input (this is Aumann’s Agreement Theorem).
“Subjectively” is an adverb that attempts to modify “objective.” If all that it means is that empirical beliefs are subjective and objective at the same time, I think the grammar of the phrasing makes the point misleading.
Further, I’m unclear about the intended point of noticing that empirical beliefs are subjective AND objective. The map is not the territory, but Eliezer seems to think this post is saying more than that—but I don’t see what more there is to say.