Perhaps the largest, most detailed piece of AI risk skepticism of 2023. It engages directly with one of the leading figures on the “high p(doom)” side of the debate.
The article generated a lot of discussion. As of January 4, 2025, it had 230 comments.
Overall, this article updated me towards strongly lowering my p(doom). It is thorough, it is clearly written and it proposes object-level solutions to problems raised by Yudkowski.
Perhaps the largest, most detailed piece of AI risk skepticism of 2023. It engages directly with one of the leading figures on the “high p(doom)” side of the debate.
The article generated a lot of discussion. As of January 4, 2025, it had 230 comments.
Overall, this article updated me towards strongly lowering my p(doom). It is thorough, it is clearly written and it proposes object-level solutions to problems raised by Yudkowski.