I was thinking of an unlimited fortune comprising wealth rather than money—that is, things that are actually valuable to people, which can be exchanged for tokens, rather than the tokens themselves—but genie wishes are admittedly problematic that way.
That said, you do seem to be jumping over a rather large middle ground in which you create the optimal amount of money for your paper-clipping (or other) needs, rather than so much money that you impede your ability to achieve your goals. Access to unlimited funds doesn’t actually obligate you to create money as rapidly as possible.
Speaking of insufficiently well-specified requests, incidentally, while I do recall suggesting a while back that “ape” is considered an impolite (though accurate) descriptor for other LW users, “non-ape” is less accurate without being significantly more polite, so is hardly an improvement.
Sure, that’s true.
I was thinking of an unlimited fortune comprising wealth rather than money—that is, things that are actually valuable to people, which can be exchanged for tokens, rather than the tokens themselves—but genie wishes are admittedly problematic that way.
That said, you do seem to be jumping over a rather large middle ground in which you create the optimal amount of money for your paper-clipping (or other) needs, rather than so much money that you impede your ability to achieve your goals. Access to unlimited funds doesn’t actually obligate you to create money as rapidly as possible.
Speaking of insufficiently well-specified requests, incidentally, while I do recall suggesting a while back that “ape” is considered an impolite (though accurate) descriptor for other LW users, “non-ape” is less accurate without being significantly more polite, so is hardly an improvement.
Oh, OK, thank you for the advice, that’s the kind of thing a good human would do.
(nods) Thanks. I find it useful to simulate one on occasion.