Doesn’t someone have to hit the ball back for it to be “tennis”?
Looks like someone already did.
And I’m not just suggesting this is not productive, I’m saying it’s not productive. My reasoning is standard: see here and also here.
Standard? Invoking reference classes is a form of arguing by analogy. It’s a basic thinking tool. Don’t knock it if you don’t know how to use it.
Don’t be obnoxious. I linked to two posts that discuss the issue in depth. There’s no need to reduce my comment to one meaningless word.
Looks like someone already did.
And I’m not just suggesting this is not productive, I’m saying it’s not productive. My reasoning is standard: see here and also here.
Standard? Invoking reference classes is a form of arguing by analogy. It’s a basic thinking tool. Don’t knock it if you don’t know how to use it.
Don’t be obnoxious. I linked to two posts that discuss the issue in depth. There’s no need to reduce my comment to one meaningless word.