Frankly, when someone writes a post recommending global thermonuclear war as a possible option, that’s my line. My suggested courses of action are noticeably less melodramatic and noticeably closer to the plain, boring field of WW3-prevention.
The currently fashionable descriptor is “metacontrarianism”—you might get better responses if you phrase your objection in that way.
The currently fashionable descriptor is “metacontrarianism”—you might get better responses if you phrase your objection in that way.
(man, I LOVE when things go factorially N-meta)
I’m not actually sure who the metacontrarian is here.
Hence my delight in the factorial metaness.