And we have a good idea of what signals we care about.
Seems dubious. Or, understood narrowly, is an irrelevant tautology, and the real question is which signals are important (what we should care about), which again is unclear whether we know that.
At least it’d be good to give further evidence (sorry if that is elsewhere and I missed it).
I’m not confident enough to claim the statement is either likely wrong or a tautology, but I also do not know in what sense Nina thinks we have a good idea of what signals we care about, and ask for more clarification on this point.
Seems dubious. Or, understood narrowly, is an irrelevant tautology, and the real question is which signals are important (what we should care about), which again is unclear whether we know that.
At least it’d be good to give further evidence (sorry if that is elsewhere and I missed it).
I’m not confident enough to claim the statement is either likely wrong or a tautology, but I also do not know in what sense Nina thinks we have a good idea of what signals we care about, and ask for more clarification on this point.