The problem is that almost everything is a form of anthropic reasoning. The only difference is degrees of correlation over time and space. If everything about oneself—including one’s history that includes observations—is “a datum that needs/has no logical explanation”, then nothing has or needs logical explanation.
The problem is that almost everything is a form of anthropic reasoning. The only difference is degrees of correlation over time and space. If everything about oneself—including one’s history that includes observations—is “a datum that needs/has no logical explanation”, then nothing has or needs logical explanation.
Is that what you intended to imply?