No, it’s not. It is the most obvious case of being 5% sure that something is true in every Everett branch, but it’s not the only one. For example, I think a particle has the same mass in every Everett branch, but not even logical omniscience will tell you the exact mass.
No, it’s not. It is the most obvious case of being 5% sure that something is true in every Everett branch, but it’s not the only one. For example, I think a particle has the same mass in every Everett branch, but not even logical omniscience will tell you the exact mass.
Well, yes. The point is that there’s a set of common problems that distinguish between the extreme cases, and therefore justify names.