Clearly our moral standards are informed by our society, and in no small part those standards emerge from discussions about what we collectively would like those standards to be, and not just a genetically hardwired disloyalty sensor.
Yes, these discussions set / update group norms. Perceived defection from group norms triggers the genetically hardwired disloyalty sensor.
In pressured environments we act on instinct, but those instincts don’t exist in a vacuum
Right, System 1 contains adaptations optimized to signal adherence to group norms.
the societal project of working out what [people’s instincts] ought to be is quite important and pretty hard
The societal project of working out what norms other people should adhere to is known as “politics”, and lots of people would agree that it’s important.
Well, I basically agree with everything you just said. I think we have quite different opinions about what politics is, though, and what it’s for. But perhaps this isn’t the best place to resolve those differences.
Yes, these discussions set / update group norms. Perceived defection from group norms triggers the genetically hardwired disloyalty sensor.
Right, System 1 contains adaptations optimized to signal adherence to group norms.
The societal project of working out what norms other people should adhere to is known as “politics”, and lots of people would agree that it’s important.
Well, I basically agree with everything you just said. I think we have quite different opinions about what politics is, though, and what it’s for. But perhaps this isn’t the best place to resolve those differences.