Would John Cramer’s transactional interpretation require more complexity (at the level of the fundamental laws, rather than the amount of stuff in the universe) than the many worlds interpretation?
Roughly what proportion of the physics community backs it?
Is it a non-differentiable (or even discontinuous) phenomenon?
Is it non-local in the configuration space?
Does it violates CPT symmetry?
Does it violate Liouville’s Theorem (has a many-to-one mapping from initial conditions to outcomes)?
Is it acausal / non-deterministic / inherently random?
Is it non-local in spacetime?
Could it propagate an influence faster than light?
Can it represent a non-linear or non-unitary evolution?
I’m curious about the following...
Would John Cramer’s transactional interpretation require more complexity (at the level of the fundamental laws, rather than the amount of stuff in the universe) than the many worlds interpretation?
Roughly what proportion of the physics community backs it?
Is it a non-differentiable (or even discontinuous) phenomenon?
Is it non-local in the configuration space?
Does it violates CPT symmetry?
Does it violate Liouville’s Theorem (has a many-to-one mapping from initial conditions to outcomes)?
Is it acausal / non-deterministic / inherently random?
Is it non-local in spacetime?
Could it propagate an influence faster than light?
Can it represent a non-linear or non-unitary evolution?
No God-damned puppies were harmed in the making of this comment.