Do you have a precise meaning of “unscientific” in mind?
I mean that they maintain practices, justified on scientific grounds, that are blatantly illogical.
I don’t see what’s unscientific, and I don’t see what’s illogical either. At best, they can be criticized for excessive caution, or a bad consideration of risks and benefits—but it’s no slamdunk.
I don’t see what’s unscientific, and I don’t see what’s illogical either. At best, they can be criticized for excessive caution, or a bad consideration of risks and benefits—but it’s no slamdunk.