Quite right, don’t assume. Think it through. Then you may be less inclined to pepper your posts with non-sequiturs like “magically”, “pretending” and “naive”.
I’m familiar with the document, as well as approximately everything else said on the subject here, even in passing.
Great! But, IMHO, you have a tendency to miss the point. So:
Can I also ask you to re-read CEV, paying particular attention to Q4 and Q8 in the PAQ section? They deal with the instinctive discomfort of including everyone in the CEV.
Quite right, don’t assume. Think it through. Then you may be less inclined to pepper your posts with non-sequiturs like “magically”, “pretending” and “naive”.
Great! But, IMHO, you have a tendency to miss the point. So: