I am wary of using arguments along the lines of “CEV is better for everyone than CEV”. If
calculating based on a subset happens to be the most
practical instrumentally useful hack for implementing
CEV then an even remotely competent AI can
figure that out itself.
I would still implement the CEV option but I’d do
it for real reasons.
Jack wrote:
That something you want to say in public?
wedrifid wrote:
Yes. I really don’t want the volition of psychopaths,
suicidal fanatics and jerks in general to be extrapolated
in such a way as it could destroy all that I hold dear.
Let this be my solemnly sworn testimony made public where
all can see. Allow me (wedrifid_2011) to commit to my
declaration of my preferences as of the 21st of October by
requesting that you quote me, leaving me unable to edit it
away.
wedrifid wrote:
Jack wrote:
wedrifid wrote: