Hmm, yes, that was poorly phrased. You both think we need a new paradigm, and that something fundamental is missing, but your conclusion as to what it means for how worried we should be is opposite.
Changed that last sentence to:
> They both agree that current algorithms are missing something fundamental, yet draw opposite conclusions about what that means for AGI risk and timelines.
Hmm, yes, that was poorly phrased. You both think we need a new paradigm, and that something fundamental is missing, but your conclusion as to what it means for how worried we should be is opposite.
Changed that last sentence to:
> They both agree that current algorithms are missing something fundamental, yet draw opposite conclusions about what that means for AGI risk and timelines.