Is it plausible to you that there’s some equivalent to ‘mental simulations’ humans use for model-based world-sample-efficient learning?
If so is it plausible they are mostly (overwhelmingly?) subconscious? If so could those be much (orders of magnitude?) faster than equivalent real-world interaction?
(I tentatively think yes to all of these, mostly because of the computer science of it, without much context on the neuroscience of it. cf my other comment on temporal abstraction.)
Is it plausible to you that there’s some equivalent to ‘mental simulations’ humans use for model-based world-sample-efficient learning?
If so is it plausible they are mostly (overwhelmingly?) subconscious? If so could those be much (orders of magnitude?) faster than equivalent real-world interaction?
(I tentatively think yes to all of these, mostly because of the computer science of it, without much context on the neuroscience of it. cf my other comment on temporal abstraction.)
No I don’t find that plausible, sorry I don’t have time to explain why but this post section is related to where I’m coming from.