I think he should be both. What he shouldn’t be is dismissive.
(He should also consider the possibility that aesthetic judgements simply aren’t matters of objective fact, at least not wholly, but for present purposes I think that’s effectively a linguistic quibble.)
I think he should be both. What he shouldn’t be is dismissive.
(He should also consider the possibility that aesthetic judgements simply aren’t matters of objective fact, at least not wholly, but for present purposes I think that’s effectively a linguistic quibble.)