I posted again before read your answer, because I got message from Nesov with suggestion to change font and because I didn’t see my message in the main topic (it was downvoted).
My browser doesnot show mistakes in the text., sorry for them.
The main point of my post is that in order to reach maximum of existing AI projects, the freindliness system must be simple and clear. Its parts must be mutual independent so different projects could implement those part which better suited to them.
And it is better that all AI projects would have some kind of friendliness, then to have correct but complex friendliness theory which is not implemented by any AI project.
And that is why I call this plan B. Because plan A is to wait until SIAI creates friendliness theory and then implement it in its AI project.
And it is better that all AI projects would have some kind of friendliness, then to have correct but complex friendliness theory which is not implemented by any AI project.
I posted again before read your answer, because I got message from Nesov with suggestion to change font and because I didn’t see my message in the main topic (it was downvoted). My browser doesnot show mistakes in the text., sorry for them.
The main point of my post is that in order to reach maximum of existing AI projects, the freindliness system must be simple and clear. Its parts must be mutual independent so different projects could implement those part which better suited to them.
And it is better that all AI projects would have some kind of friendliness, then to have correct but complex friendliness theory which is not implemented by any AI project.
And that is why I call this plan B. Because plan A is to wait until SIAI creates friendliness theory and then implement it in its AI project.
Unfortunately incorrect. It is the same.