Indeed, but it could be different enough to count as an “exercise” to those interested in doing the causal analysis for themselves.
ETA: responded to an earlier version of the comment in which Psychohistorian claimed this was the same as Newcomb
On further analysis, I actually think it is totally different; I believe you responded to an earlier draft of my previous comment in which I said they were basically the same. Lest people get confused.
Indeed, but it could be different enough to count as an “exercise” to those interested in doing the causal analysis for themselves.
ETA: responded to an earlier version of the comment in which Psychohistorian claimed this was the same as Newcomb
On further analysis, I actually think it is totally different; I believe you responded to an earlier draft of my previous comment in which I said they were basically the same. Lest people get confused.