I believe SilasBarta has correctly (if that is the word) noted that it does not—it is perfectly possible for an agent to satisfy the new axioms and fall victim to the Allais Paradox.
To summarize my point: if you follow the new axioms, you will act differently in one-shot vs. massive-shot scenarios. Acting like the former in the latter will cause you to be money-pumped, but per the axioms, you never actually do it. So you can follow the new axioms, and still not get money-pumped.
I believe SilasBarta has correctly (if that is the word) noted that it does not—it is perfectly possible for an agent to satisfy the new axioms and fall victim to the Allais Paradox.
Edit: correction—he does not state this.
That sounds more like the exact opposite of my position.
I apologize. In the course of conversation with you, I came to that conclusion, but you reject that position.
To summarize my point: if you follow the new axioms, you will act differently in one-shot vs. massive-shot scenarios. Acting like the former in the latter will cause you to be money-pumped, but per the axioms, you never actually do it. So you can follow the new axioms, and still not get money-pumped.