I suspect you are right. But I wonder if the problem is that the experts add no value, or if the problem is that the true experts have a good idea of what should be done, but local politics prevents implementation. Obviously, for the second scenario to be plausible, we have to believe that lots of people labeled “expert” are not actually experts.
In short, is there anyone with rigorously supported proposals for improving the education system, but lost in the sea of quacks? Or is the entire field mindkilled?
But it is not used. Since it’s more than a century old, this is not for lack of time. I agree with beoShaffer that existing education institutions are pretty dysfunctional. (Which is not to say that online education might not be a productive field! But I worry that all the current interest reads like a bubble—people have given up on green energy, so what’s next on the list of liberal shibboleths...)
Spaced repetition is interesting, but I was under the impression that it was most helpful for improved memorization. I’ve always taken the criticism of the education system that it doesn’t do a good job of making the material part of the student as the most important critique.
Is there such a thing as learning without any memorization? And there’s little point in studying how it aids abstraction & conceptual understanding if you can’t even get the schools to use it for learning English or foreign language vocab, for example.
Obviously, for the second scenario to be plausible, we have to believe that lots of people labeled “expert” are not actually experts.
To a certain extent yes, but from my understanding a lot of it is that the education industry got double helpings of rent-seeking and goodheart’s law. For example in many districts unions make it effectively impossible to fire teachers once they have tenure(which is relatively easy to obtain at the k-12 level). -edit also http://lesswrong.com/lw/le/lost_purposes/
I suspect you are right. But I wonder if the problem is that the experts add no value, or if the problem is that the true experts have a good idea of what should be done, but local politics prevents implementation. Obviously, for the second scenario to be plausible, we have to believe that lots of people labeled “expert” are not actually experts.
In short, is there anyone with rigorously supported proposals for improving the education system, but lost in the sea of quacks? Or is the entire field mindkilled?
Spaced repetition is very well supported and most studies have been in educational contexts: http://www.gwern.net/Spaced%20repetition#literature-review
But it is not used. Since it’s more than a century old, this is not for lack of time. I agree with beoShaffer that existing education institutions are pretty dysfunctional. (Which is not to say that online education might not be a productive field! But I worry that all the current interest reads like a bubble—people have given up on green energy, so what’s next on the list of liberal shibboleths...)
Spaced repetition is interesting, but I was under the impression that it was most helpful for improved memorization. I’ve always taken the criticism of the education system that it doesn’t do a good job of making the material part of the student as the most important critique.
Is there such a thing as learning without any memorization? And there’s little point in studying how it aids abstraction & conceptual understanding if you can’t even get the schools to use it for learning English or foreign language vocab, for example.
To a certain extent yes, but from my understanding a lot of it is that the education industry got double helpings of rent-seeking and goodheart’s law. For example in many districts unions make it effectively impossible to fire teachers once they have tenure(which is relatively easy to obtain at the k-12 level).
-edit also http://lesswrong.com/lw/le/lost_purposes/