Since both theories satisfy all 20 experiments, for all intents and purposes of experimentation the theories are both equally valid or equally invalid.
Those guys who have the theories “Each experiment will give a successive letter of the alphabet” and “Each experiment will give the next ASCII character” may be ‘equally valid or invalid’ but, well, they lack creativity, don’t you think?
Since both theories satisfy all 20 experiments, for all intents and purposes of experimentation the theories are both equally valid or equally invalid.
My theory after seeing all 20 experiments is:
The first in the series will be ‘A’
The second in the series will be ‘B’
The third in the series will be ‘C’
The fourth in the series will be ‘D’
The fifth in the series will be ‘E’
The sixth in the series will be ‘F’
The seventh in the series will be ‘G’
The eighth in the series will be ‘H’
The ninth in the series will be ‘I’
The tenth in the series will be ‘J’
The eleventh in the series will be ‘K’
The twelfth in the series will be ‘L’
The thirteenth in the series will be ‘M’
The fourteenth in the series will be ‘N’
The fifteenth in the series will be ‘O’
The sixteenth in the series will be ‘P’
The eighteenth in the series will be ‘Q’
The twentieth in the series will be ‘R’
The twenty first in the series will be a camel.
Those guys who have the theories “Each experiment will give a successive letter of the alphabet” and “Each experiment will give the next ASCII character” may be ‘equally valid or invalid’ but, well, they lack creativity, don’t you think?