It is somewhat remarkable that this reverend divine should be so earnest for setting up new churches and so perfectly indifferent concerning the doctrine which may be taught in them. His zeal is of a curious character. It is not for the propagation of his own opinions, but of any opinions. It is not for the diffusion of truth, but for the spreading of contradiction. Let the noble teachers but dissent, it is no matter from whom or from what.
Edmund Burke on Richard Price, in “Reflections on the Revolution in France” which I am reading for the first time. This Richard Price, who is fascinating. Here is the sermon Burke was complaining about.
Haha, it’s hard not to feel a twitch of self-righteous liberal superiority upon reading Burke’s words. Even though none of us is really “liberal” in this regard—privately almost none of us value freedom of opinion more than spreading one’s own opinions; we’re just bound by a prisoner’s dilemma in this regard. Our age is more polite and hypocritical about it, though.
Edmund Burke on Richard Price, in “Reflections on the Revolution in France” which I am reading for the first time. This Richard Price, who is fascinating. Here is the sermon Burke was complaining about.
Haha, it’s hard not to feel a twitch of self-righteous liberal superiority upon reading Burke’s words. Even though none of us is really “liberal” in this regard—privately almost none of us value freedom of opinion more than spreading one’s own opinions; we’re just bound by a prisoner’s dilemma in this regard. Our age is more polite and hypocritical about it, though.
From this I can’t quite tell whether your first impulse/twitch was to side with Burke or Price.
I think I don’t value spreading my opinions at all. At least, I’m not interested in moving “public opinion.”