P_learner(desired behavior) → 𝜺 > 0 and that we have a way to condition the model to act in the desired way.
I’m very interested in this, particularly in the varying of training budgets, and whether we can get some scaling type empirical control of P_model(desired behaviour) and relatedly whether this affects conditioning.
I’ll use IFT as an example here, although with some difficulty, this can be carried forward to RLHF, etc.
We can start with some deliberate IFT pretraining budget at a fraction , say of pretraining data where I don’t know whether full pretraining on IFT ( ) is useful or informative for the purpose here, but it could be interesting for other reasons. The idea is to try study the effect of this on . Downstream this may help us tell a story of conditioning.
I’m very interested in this, particularly in the varying of training budgets, and whether we can get some scaling type empirical control of P_model(desired behaviour) and relatedly whether this affects conditioning.
Interesting—could you say more about what you have in mind?
I’ll use IFT as an example here, although with some difficulty, this can be carried forward to RLHF, etc.
of pretraining data where I don’t know whether full pretraining on IFT ( ) is useful or informative for the purpose here, but it could be interesting for other reasons. The idea is to try study the effect of this on . Downstream this may help us tell a story of conditioning.
We can start with some deliberate IFT pretraining budget at a fraction , say