You are funny. None of those criticisms apply specifically to LW, and none of them seem to be written with any knowledge of the LW material. You seem to think LW is another outpost of dawkins-style atheism/​skepticism. That’s not what we are about.
You are funny. None of those criticisms apply specifically to LW, and none of them seem to be written with any knowledge of the LW material. You seem to think LW is another outpost of dawkins-style atheism/​skepticism. That’s not what we are about.