I’ve no intention of arguing any of the following. I don’t necessarily even have an argument, but I just feel like putting down this marker.
These three things I do not take seriously, yea, four is the number thereof. Quantum Immortality, the Many Worlds Interpretation, the Simulation Hypothesis, and Pascal’s Mugging.
This is it. There’s only one of it. Don’t break it.
I’m ok with that one. Theoretically important, mathematically formalises Occam’s razor, but non-constructive: you can’t actually find the shortest generator of any given data.
I’ve no intention of arguing any of the following. I don’t necessarily even have an argument, but I just feel like putting down this marker.
These three things I do not take seriously, yea, four is the number thereof. Quantum Immortality, the Many Worlds Interpretation, the Simulation Hypothesis, and Pascal’s Mugging.
This is it. There’s only one of it. Don’t break it.
What about Tegmark Level I (copies of Earth existing far away from each other in infinite space) and the associated kind of immortality?
Yea, five shall be their number. Adds “Tegmark Levels” to the end of the list.
Solomonoff Induction?
I’m ok with that one. Theoretically important, mathematically formalises Occam’s razor, but non-constructive: you can’t actually find the shortest generator of any given data.
Now they are six:
Quantum Immortality
the Many Worlds Interpretation
the Simulation Hypothesis
Pascal’s Mugging
Tegmark levels
the Doomsday Argument.