When writing a long sequence it’s tempting to spend lots of time justifying it. But other people don’t care about your sequence as much as you do! If the next post doesn’t start the analysis proper I’m going to lose interest.
I also feel like I should mention my recent post “Focus on Rationality”. You sell your sequence as training ourselves on the example of politics. This is different to just giving a rational exploration of politics, you have to say what we’re learning about rationality, as well as the learning about politics. I raise this because you’ve explicitly sold your sequence as rationality training.
When writing a long sequence it’s tempting to spend lots of time justifying it. But other people don’t care about your sequence as much as you do! If the next post doesn’t start the analysis proper I’m going to lose interest.
I also feel like I should mention my recent post “Focus on Rationality”. You sell your sequence as training ourselves on the example of politics. This is different to just giving a rational exploration of politics, you have to say what we’re learning about rationality, as well as the learning about politics. I raise this because you’ve explicitly sold your sequence as rationality training.