Views on AGI seem suspiciously correlated to me, as if many people’s views are more determined by diffusion through social networks and popular writing, rather than independent reasoning.
This seems difficult to disprove. What is the claim here?
It’s straightforward to disprove: they should be able to argue for their views in a way that stands up to scrutiny.
This seems difficult to disprove. What is the claim here?
It’s straightforward to disprove: they should be able to argue for their views in a way that stands up to scrutiny.