I will have to check more on microwaves, I’m not comfortable recommending them right now.
Regarding the trusted circle part
Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s house was broken into by CIA agent Howard Hunt.
Assange’s lawyers had to communicate via encrypted comms because they realised they were being spied on. There is a long list of cases of lawyers being intimidated and surveilled.
You can just go look at the websites of legal resources on this topic, none of them are willing to even hint at the notion that they might support classified leaks. If you actually schedule calls with them, you’ll realise the same thing.
Regarding psychology, I basically agree and I don’t think I have solved this problem yet. Hence I didn’t share much about it. I’d love if you could write more about it about your personal experience (either in public, or we could have a private chat) as it is valuable info.
Regarding Russia, my only consideration is probability of not going to prison (or worse). Do you propose any other country with a lower probability of going to prison?
is the implication that it’s an unconfirmed open secret the AI labs are doing really bad stuff?
Almost certainly yes as of today, and everything builds a larger picture. For instance if some of the leaders are proven to be sex offenders like Altman has been accused of (idk if the accusations are true), or are proven to be successionists like Rich Sutton is, it strengthens the political movement against building ASI.
I expect my guide to be even more valuable a couple years from now, than it is today.
I’m not a huge fan of the famous whistleblowers personally, they were reckless and put lives at risk.
I can maybe see why you have that opinion, but I think the criteria here should be something closer to—who used less violence—the US govt or the people exposing them? Since I expect ASI to lead to human extinction or a permanent dictatorship, I am highly open to solutions that involve some violence or collateral damage, but are not as bad as the ASI outcome itself.
Thanks for the reply!
I will have to check more on microwaves, I’m not comfortable recommending them right now.
Regarding the trusted circle part
Daniel Ellsberg’s psychiatrist’s house was broken into by CIA agent Howard Hunt.
Assange’s lawyers had to communicate via encrypted comms because they realised they were being spied on. There is a long list of cases of lawyers being intimidated and surveilled.
You can just go look at the websites of legal resources on this topic, none of them are willing to even hint at the notion that they might support classified leaks. If you actually schedule calls with them, you’ll realise the same thing.
Regarding psychology, I basically agree and I don’t think I have solved this problem yet. Hence I didn’t share much about it. I’d love if you could write more about it about your personal experience (either in public, or we could have a private chat) as it is valuable info.
Regarding Russia, my only consideration is probability of not going to prison (or worse). Do you propose any other country with a lower probability of going to prison?
Almost certainly yes as of today, and everything builds a larger picture. For instance if some of the leaders are proven to be sex offenders like Altman has been accused of (idk if the accusations are true), or are proven to be successionists like Rich Sutton is, it strengthens the political movement against building ASI.
I expect my guide to be even more valuable a couple years from now, than it is today.
I can maybe see why you have that opinion, but I think the criteria here should be something closer to—who used less violence—the US govt or the people exposing them? Since I expect ASI to lead to human extinction or a permanent dictatorship, I am highly open to solutions that involve some violence or collateral damage, but are not as bad as the ASI outcome itself.