Would you mind explaining why you have biased emotions on the subject? It seems strange to me. Aside from being a 150-year-old conflict, the moral questions revolving around the Civil War seem like they pretty much swamp the legal questions. From the C.S.A’s perspective even if secession was illegal I would still expect them to do it given what they believed and would consider them justified if their beliefs and values were mine. Same goes for the North. The law seems like a minor player here.
Because I’m used to the idea from a lot of Internet arguments that such a secession was legal, and because I have a strong dislike for the Supreme Court for often (sometimes admittedly!) going so far from both the original intent and original wording of the Constitution.
These are admittedly both emotional biases, but they’re the truth of the matter.
I have a strong dislike for the Supreme Court for often (sometimes admittedly!) going so far from both the original intent and original wording of the Constitution.
An emotional dislike, which is itself irrational, for anybody breaking the rules. The root of that is most likely Aspergers Syndrome.
(Admittedly upon thought I realise there’s another influence I’m not sure if I can accurately asess of the fact my parents don’t like the Supreme Court because of Roe v.s Wade)
Would you mind explaining why you have biased emotions on the subject? It seems strange to me. Aside from being a 150-year-old conflict, the moral questions revolving around the Civil War seem like they pretty much swamp the legal questions. From the C.S.A’s perspective even if secession was illegal I would still expect them to do it given what they believed and would consider them justified if their beliefs and values were mine. Same goes for the North. The law seems like a minor player here.
Because I’m used to the idea from a lot of Internet arguments that such a secession was legal, and because I have a strong dislike for the Supreme Court for often (sometimes admittedly!) going so far from both the original intent and original wording of the Constitution.
These are admittedly both emotional biases, but they’re the truth of the matter.
Why?
An emotional dislike, which is itself irrational, for anybody breaking the rules. The root of that is most likely Aspergers Syndrome.
(Admittedly upon thought I realise there’s another influence I’m not sure if I can accurately asess of the fact my parents don’t like the Supreme Court because of Roe v.s Wade)