I think there’s an idea that a paper with a p=0.05 finding should replicate 95% of the time. If it doesn’t then the p-value was wrong.
That’s not really what a p-value means though, right? The actual replication rate should depend on the prior and the power of the studies.
I think there’s an idea that a paper with a p=0.05 finding should replicate 95% of the time. If it doesn’t then the p-value was wrong.
That’s not really what a p-value means though, right? The actual replication rate should depend on the prior and the power of the studies.