This sounds interesting. I’d love to read your post. chemical weapons were used in battle in ww1 but not in ww2. Why do you think that is?
https://acoup.blog/2020/03/20/collections-why-dont-we-use-chemical-weapons-anymore/
This article explains it for me: the main reason is effectiveness. Chemical weapons don’t work well against specialized protections.
The article does an excellent job for 2020 but has become a bit dated in regards to the static warfare due to the recent Drone Revolution, the author briefly addresses that in comments
My guess is operational effectiveness rather than related to my theory (can’t explain everything), but I haven’t studied WWII much!
This sounds interesting. I’d love to read your post.
chemical weapons were used in battle in ww1 but not in ww2. Why do you think that is?
https://acoup.blog/2020/03/20/collections-why-dont-we-use-chemical-weapons-anymore/
This article explains it for me: the main reason is effectiveness. Chemical weapons don’t work well against specialized protections.
The article does an excellent job for 2020 but has become a bit dated in regards to the static warfare due to the recent Drone Revolution, the author briefly addresses that in comments
My guess is operational effectiveness rather than related to my theory (can’t explain everything), but I haven’t studied WWII much!