You might find this recent Federal Middle District of Florida Court decision interesting. I think this is one of the first cases where defendants are trying to argue that LLM output is speech under the 1st Am. The Court held that CharacterAI could assert 1st Am. rights of users, but did not find that LLM output constituted speech for constitutional purposes (p. 27-31)
You might find this recent Federal Middle District of Florida Court decision interesting. I think this is one of the first cases where defendants are trying to argue that LLM output is speech under the 1st Am. The Court held that CharacterAI could assert 1st Am. rights of users, but did not find that LLM output constituted speech for constitutional purposes (p. 27-31)
Thanks, this is an useful update!