My best guess for this is something like coding is both more routinized and more explicit. That is, the thinking and the tokens are synonymous. One can’t think the correct code and not be able to actually implement the correct code if you’re literally thinking about the exact text of the code. Whereas one can think the correct text in natural language and not implement the correct idea.
Another way of saying this is: there are more reasoning steps in excess of the tokens implicitly required by the most bare bones version of the reasoning process.
Probably you’ve already thought of this and thought of a reason that it’s wrong.
My best guess for this is something like coding is both more routinized and more explicit. That is, the thinking and the tokens are synonymous. One can’t think the correct code and not be able to actually implement the correct code if you’re literally thinking about the exact text of the code. Whereas one can think the correct text in natural language and not implement the correct idea.
Another way of saying this is: there are more reasoning steps in excess of the tokens implicitly required by the most bare bones version of the reasoning process.
Probably you’ve already thought of this and thought of a reason that it’s wrong.