I don’t contest that, but they’re being violated to lower the status of groups I’m sympathetic to, rather than raising it. It’s not a benign violation.
Do you agree with the arguments, or are you sympathetic to people who advance those arguments? If so, you identify with the subgroup that attacks the norms, so it feels beneficial to you (no matter whether it actually is).
The norms that are thus violated are also norms of your in-group, otherwise they wouldn’t be considered norms.
I don’t contest that, but they’re being violated to lower the status of groups I’m sympathetic to, rather than raising it. It’s not a benign violation.
Do you agree with the arguments, or are you sympathetic to people who advance those arguments? If so, you identify with the subgroup that attacks the norms, so it feels beneficial to you (no matter whether it actually is).
No to both cases, but I still found them funny.