It’s not “moving forward”, it’s moving to a separate question.
I like the precision of your thought.
All this time I thought we were discussing if blocking future censorship by EY was a rational thing to do—but it’s not what we were discussing at all.
You really are in it for the details—if we could find a way of estimating around hard problems to solve the above question, that’s only vaguely interesting to you—you want to know the answers to these questions.
At least that’s what I’m hearing.
It sounds like the above was your way of saying you’re in favor of blocking future EY censorship, which gratifies me.
I’m going to do the following things in the hope of gratifying you:
Writing up a post on less wrong for developing political muscles. I’ve noticed several other posters seem less than savvy about social dynamics, so perhaps a crash course is in order. (I know that there are certainly several in the archives, I guarantee I’ll bring several new insights [with references] to the table).
Reread all your comments, and come back at these issues tomorrow night with a more exact approach. Please accept my apology for what I assume seemed a bizarre discussion, and thanks for thinking like that.
I like the precision of your thought.
All this time I thought we were discussing if blocking future censorship by EY was a rational thing to do—but it’s not what we were discussing at all.
You really are in it for the details—if we could find a way of estimating around hard problems to solve the above question, that’s only vaguely interesting to you—you want to know the answers to these questions.
At least that’s what I’m hearing.
It sounds like the above was your way of saying you’re in favor of blocking future EY censorship, which gratifies me.
I’m going to do the following things in the hope of gratifying you:
Writing up a post on less wrong for developing political muscles. I’ve noticed several other posters seem less than savvy about social dynamics, so perhaps a crash course is in order. (I know that there are certainly several in the archives, I guarantee I’ll bring several new insights [with references] to the table).
Reread all your comments, and come back at these issues tomorrow night with a more exact approach. Please accept my apology for what I assume seemed a bizarre discussion, and thanks for thinking like that.
Night!
I didn’t address that question at all, and in fact I’m not in favor of blocking anything. I came closest to that topic in this comment.