It is trivial, but it’s because the great-grandparent of your comment is essentially a statement of the parent.
The parent is not, as the grandparent takes pains to be, ‘respectful to the complexity of the human condition’. The grandparent is obviously true. The parent is fairly unintelligible: in order to make sense of it, we have to define moods in such a way as to make it an empty tautology.
The parent is not, as the grandparent takes pains to be, ‘respectful to the complexity of the human condition’. The grandparent is obviously true. The parent is fairly unintelligible: in order to make sense of it, we have to define moods in such a way as to make it an empty tautology.