I am really thinking that they’ll be deployed beyond their areas of reliable competence. If it can do even 50% of the work it might be worth it. As that goes up, it doesn’t need to be nearly 100% competent. I guess a factor I didn’t mention is that the rates of alarming mistakes should be far higher in deployment than testing, because the real world throws lots of curve balls it’s hard to come up with in training and testing.
And I think the downsides of AI incompetence will not fall on mostly on the businesses that deploy them, but on the AI itself. Which isn’t right, but it’s helpful for people blaming and fearing AI.
I am really thinking that they’ll be deployed beyond their areas of reliable competence. If it can do even 50% of the work it might be worth it. As that goes up, it doesn’t need to be nearly 100% competent. I guess a factor I didn’t mention is that the rates of alarming mistakes should be far higher in deployment than testing, because the real world throws lots of curve balls it’s hard to come up with in training and testing.
And I think the downsides of AI incompetence will not fall on mostly on the businesses that deploy them, but on the AI itself. Which isn’t right, but it’s helpful for people blaming and fearing AI.