I would actually say that voting to correct post-quality would lead to some odd social dynamics. I’ll vote up if something is negative for no reason, but otherwise I’ll vote my opinion, not corrections—unless something seems really out of line.
I’d rather have the sum of people’s individual components then see everyone trying to correct everyone else’s voting.
I would actually say that voting to correct post-quality would lead to some odd social dynamics. I’ll vote up if something is negative for no reason, but otherwise I’ll vote my opinion, not corrections—unless something seems really out of line.
I’d rather have the sum of people’s individual components then see everyone trying to correct everyone else’s voting.
Agreed—I’ve been using voting the same way:
if (score < 0 && myPreferredScore >=0)
vote up
else
vote my conscience
Edit: had to camelCase the name above due to odd behavior of underscores. I should learn MarkDown.