I wonder about this. I agree that fewer people will read it, but it’s not clear that’s that’s bad—they will presumably tend to be the people who were less interested in it. In general there’s a lot of good content on the internet, and I view the scenario where everyone tries to maximise readership of their content as a defecting strategy. I’d rather give the best information so that people can decide whether to read it.
I’m really not sure about this, though—maybe enough of the those who pass would benefit from it that it’s worth trying to maximise readership at least among people here.
Another reason not to post it is that it’s 14 pages.
Could you post the actual article? I think far fewer people will read it if they have to suffer the trivial inconvenience of clicking the link.
I wonder about this. I agree that fewer people will read it, but it’s not clear that’s that’s bad—they will presumably tend to be the people who were less interested in it. In general there’s a lot of good content on the internet, and I view the scenario where everyone tries to maximise readership of their content as a defecting strategy. I’d rather give the best information so that people can decide whether to read it.
I’m really not sure about this, though—maybe enough of the those who pass would benefit from it that it’s worth trying to maximise readership at least among people here.
Another reason not to post it is that it’s 14 pages.