This I knew from the beginning: That if I had no ethics I would hold to even with the world at stake, I had no ethics at all. And I could guess how that would turn out.
This line has always confused me. How DOES he think “that” would turn out, aside from him being less of a whiny goody-two-shoes?
Eliezer previously on the utility of ethics and truth-telling particularly.
This line has always confused me. How DOES he think “that” would turn out, aside from him being less of a whiny goody-two-shoes?