Again, read the G-Zombie Argument carefully. You cannot deny your existence.Here is the original argument, more formally… (But there is a more formal version)https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qBbj6C6sKHnQfbmgY/i-g-zombieIf you deny your existence… and you dont exist… AHA! Well then we have a complete system. Which is impossible.But since nobody is reading the paper fully, and everyone makes lound mouth assumptions what I wan’t to show with EN...The G-Zombie, is not the P-Zombie argument, but a far more abstract formulation. But these idiots dont get it.
Again, read the G-Zombie Argument carefully. You cannot deny your existence.
Here is the original argument, more formally… (But there is a more formal version)
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/qBbj6C6sKHnQfbmgY/i-g-zombie
If you deny your existence… and you dont exist… AHA! Well then we have a complete system. Which is impossible.
But since nobody is reading the paper fully, and everyone makes lound mouth assumptions what I wan’t to show with EN...
The G-Zombie, is not the P-Zombie argument, but a far more abstract formulation. But these idiots dont get it.