Not so fast. If your definitions of “married” v. “unmarried” are non-binary—that is, if you consider “widowed” or “divorced” or “handfasted” to be categories of “other”, then you’re going to “get the puzzle wrong”.
If, on the other hand, it were a more definitionally binary question—“wearing a wedding ring” for example—that would be another story. Though I suspect it would be ‘gotten wrong’ roughly as frequently, since such views of “married”/”unmarried” are likely unconventional.
Not so fast. If your definitions of “married” v. “unmarried” are non-binary—that is, if you consider “widowed” or “divorced” or “handfasted” to be categories of “other”, then you’re going to “get the puzzle wrong”.
If, on the other hand, it were a more definitionally binary question—“wearing a wedding ring” for example—that would be another story. Though I suspect it would be ‘gotten wrong’ roughly as frequently, since such views of “married”/”unmarried” are likely unconventional.