I think people are confused about that CTMU is a mathematical metaphysics, but because even the intelligent and learning in our society are not used to thinking about metaphysics, there’s a constant temptation to make CTMU about something else.
“What types of things exist and why?”
I was struck by the similarity in style, if not content, to Leibniz and would be very interested to read a Langan commentary on Leibniz’ metaphysics.
I think people are confused about that CTMU is a mathematical metaphysics, but because even the intelligent and learning in our society are not used to thinking about metaphysics, there’s a constant temptation to make CTMU about something else.
“What types of things exist and why?”
I was struck by the similarity in style, if not content, to Leibniz and would be very interested to read a Langan commentary on Leibniz’ metaphysics.