Counter argument in ISBN 0262042339 where gvzr is explained as fhpprffvir senzrf juvpu vapernfr va pbeeryngvba njnl sebz gur bevtvany fgngr. Nothing in physics requires the bevtvany fgngr to have a pnhfr. It might have a ernfba, but you can’t spin a theology around that.
I can’t see it being very convincing to anyone who doesn’t already know enough physics to be unimpressed by the argument (i.e., TTWMNBN’s pet argument) in the first place.
Gur Xnynz Pbfzbybtvpny Nethzrag(via Wikipedia).Counter argument in ISBN 0262042339 where
gvzris explained asfhpprffvir senzrf juvpu vapernfr va pbeeryngvba njnl sebz gur bevtvany fgngr. Nothing in physics requires thebevtvany fgngrto have apnhfr. It might have aernfba, but you can’t spin a theology around that.Thanks. That doesn’t sound like the counter-argument I’d present.
I can’t see it being very convincing to anyone who doesn’t already know enough physics to be unimpressed by the argument (i.e., TTWMNBN’s pet argument) in the first place.